Skip to main content

Prayer Is Not a Policy

Earlier this week, the Ministry of Youth and Gender Affairs launched what it called a “groundbreaking initiative”.


The National Week of Prayer Against Gender-Based Violence under the theme “United in Prayer, Solidarity Against GBV.” 


I know right? And look, we’ll get to women in positions of power upholding misogynistic and patriarchal values another day. Or maybe later today. 


One crisis at a time, neh? 


So here’s the thing. Botswana is facing a relentless and escalating epidemic of GBV. From child rape to domestic homicide, survivors are left with shattered lives, limited access to justice, and an insufficient social support system. With churches, religious groups, and communities being called to unite in spiritual solidarity against a national crisis, this initiative was painted as a hopeful, healing intervention. But let’s be brutally honest: this is not what change looks like.


A man was able to walk into a university and take a woman’s life as she was actively seeking a restraining order against him—and you want us to… bow our heads?


The appropriate response to such violence is not prayer—it is policy. It is legislation. It is urgent investment in education, law enforcement training, survivor protection, forensic services, shelter infrastructure, and legal reform. And yet, we are being offered candles and scripture.


Is this real life? I get it… we’re on a floating rock in a vacuum, but are we being serious right now? 


This is not to say that spirituality has no place in healing. For many, prayer is a coping mechanism. It offers solace in the aftermath of trauma. But we must never confuse spiritual comfort with systemic change. A week of collective prayer does nothing to deter a rapist, protect a child, or ensure a woman makes it out of her home alive. It won’t undo years of patriarchal conditioning, nor will it hold perpetrators accountable in a country where many victims withdraw their cases out of fear, pressure, or lack of faith in the justice system.


While prayer holds deep cultural significance for many in Botswana, the state’s increasing reliance on Christian frameworks to address national crises—like gender-based violence—raises serious concerns about the separation of church and state. Government-endorsed initiatives like the National Week of Prayer Against GBV risk alienating non-Christian citizens and blurring constitutional lines. In a secular democracy, responses to violence and justice must be inclusive, rights-based, and rooted in law—not faith.


This growing overlap introduces a dangerous ideological conflict. Where religion often emphasizes forgiveness, prayer, and moral redemption, the state has a legal and constitutional duty to ensure accountability, protection, and justice. When the government leans too heavily on religious approaches, it risks minimizing the systemic nature of GBV and promoting reconciliation over prosecution. Spirituality may offer comfort, but it cannot and must not replace the structural reforms survivors urgently need.


To frame forgiveness and prayer as solutions, especially when praying for perpetrators, is a dangerous and terrifying step backward. How out of touch can you possibly be? This rhetoric subtly shifts responsibility from systems to individuals and waters down the structural reality of GBV. It promotes reconciliation in situations where what is actually needed is justice, safety, and accountability.


Let’s also not ignore that this initiative leans heavily on Christianity in a country that is religiously diverse. Yes, 86.5% of Batswana identify as Christian, and prayer may be culturally significant—but state-sponsored responses to violence must remain secular, inclusive, and rights-based. Victims of GBV are not asking for prayer circles! They’re asking for rape kits, trained prosecutors, trauma-informed police officers, and laws that actually protect them.


Did you know that, according to various local reports and advocacy organizations, less than 2% of reported rape cases in Botswana result in prosecution—let alone conviction?


Yes. Two. As in one plus one.


Meanwhile, we’re preaching moral development to children while ignoring the predators in their homes and schools. That’s not moral guidance—that’s hypocrisy. Morality cannot be instilled through Sunday School alone when children’s lived environments remain unsafe, underfunded, and unprotected.


We cannot afford symbolism when the crisis demands substance. A ribbon is not a shelter. A verse is not a conviction. A vigil is not a protection order.


Spirituality may aid the healing journey, but it is not a substitute for justice.


To the Ministry of Youth and Gender Affairs: If you are truly committed to ending GBV, then show us the budget. Show us the shelters. Show us the laws. Show us the convictions. Show us justice. Because prayer without action is empty.


If you want to read it for yourself: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EzM8NpUNz/ 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Between Religion and Spirituality

I have been going through a lot. Not in the casual, everyday sense, but in the full-on mental breakdown sense—the ugly crying in the middle of the night to my partner, the friend nursing me back to health, the “cannot be left alone” kind of going through a lot. In the midst of that, I jokingly made a comment: that my current life experiences are almost enough to make me revert to organized religion. But even as I said it, I knew that comment itself contained the very reason I have problems with organized religion. So many people turn to their belief systems in times of hardship only. And yet, that reliance has always felt conditional, inconsistent—like a crutch pulled out only when the world feels unbearable. I grew up Roman Catholic, as did most of my family. Catholicism is a world of its own, but when we moved to South Africa and entered a “church hopping” phase, I quickly became confused and unimpressed. Who exactly were we praising here? Something always felt off about what I was w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bloom Again

I hope this is the last time I’ll be this candid. I tell myself that each time — that I’ll keep my thoughts locked in a private journal. But this isn’t that. This is for the moments when silence feels heavier than the truth, and when the truth is met with the world’s strange discomfort with the word  victim. I put the word in quotes because somewhere along the way, society decided it’s unseemly for us to claim it.  Survivor  is the softer, braver term. It’s supposed to shake off the pity in people’s eyes, to make us sound like we’ve climbed out of the wreckage and dusted ourselves off. I understand why some prefer it. But maybe it’s the literalist in me — I don’t understand why naming what happened to me is considered self-pity. I was wronged. I was harmed. I am the victim of a crime. That acknowledgment doesn’t mean I carry it as a badge or romanticize it. It’s just the truth. After putting my thoughts on trial I realized that it’s easier for me to think of things that h...
Post a Comment
Read more

logic and emotion: a tale as old as the patriarchy

Dear Reader, I’d appreciate it if you read this blog post in the same cadence of Phaedra Parks checking Kenya Moore. It’s more fun. Or maybe Superman  talking to Lex Luthor?  Anyway. Here I come with another think piece that I keep hearing about, and I’m so tired, exhausted, and incredibly fatigued of hearing about it. You see, there’s a subspecies of human beings that wholeheartedly believe that logic and emotion might as well be oil and water.  Mind you, basing your argument on simply sounding like the Terminator doesn’t really change anything. You’re just robotic and wrong, possibly even a weirdo. I remember back in my first year of university, our group chat was on fire. Someone had the audacity to say, “This is why women don’t belong in the noble profession; they’re too emotional to argue with logic.” I had a laugh. As I’m having one now. The way men think sometimes—it’s so obtuse and primitive, like evolution took a lunch break and forgot to clock back in. And ...
Post a Comment
Read more