Skip to main content

Who is the father?

I had a version of this piece sitting in my drafts—a more charged version that addressed the negative attention I received during my pregnancy. That was written by a different version of me, fueled by none other than postpartum rage. I know and recognize when I write, think, or speak from a place of anger. While I’ll never suppress my anger (it has its purpose), I’ve learned to feel it, let it go, and move forward. Anger often serves as a clue to the real issue: Am I hurt? Embarrassed? You know, the usual suspects.

Today, I write from a more lighthearted perspective because I stumbled upon a quote. I don’t remember it word for word, but it went something like: “We give people way too much credit for having malicious intent.” And it’s true. People say all kinds of things for all kinds of reasons. Of course, intention doesn’t erase impact—that’s not what I’m saying. I’m not justifying ignorance, insensitivity, or outright dumbbitchery (mine included). But sometimes, it’s better to laugh and move on because, more often than not, the things people say have absolutely nothing to do with you.

Let me give you an example. On three separate occasions, people asked me who fathered my daughter.

I know. 

The first two happened during my pregnancy and were the reasons I wrote that angry draft I never posted. The third one? It’s what made me realize we really do give people too much credit.

When I shared my pregnancy news, I told my friends one by one, taking my time with each conversation. Some figured it out on their own; others needed confirmation. But there was one particular former friend I delayed telling. I just knew something would go wrong. And it did.

When I finally told her, our conversation was uncomfortable from the start. I had a habit of overlooking her behavior—we’d had our fair share of bad fights—but something about her asking, “Who’s the father?” broke the camel’s back for me. It was rude, disrespectful, and completely unfounded. I asked her what she meant, and y’all… she doubled down. She said she knew girls who had children with men who weren’t their partners, so she “had to check.”

Yhu! I have to laugh.

I personally stopped sharing pregnancy updates with her after that. I had no interest in discussing it further. Our last conversation became our last conversation, period. Because no matter how much respect someone does or doesn’t have for your relationship, questioning your character like that—when they know you—is deplorable.

It's just a wtf moment.

The second time it happened, it was a relative. I thought we were close, but (spoiler) we aren’t—not anymore, though not just because of this. She asked me who the father was, and I laughed, thinking it was a joke. But when I realized I was laughing alone, it hit me: her comment wasn’t a joke at all. It was steeped in self-righteousness, fueled by her holier-than-thou attitude about “doing things by the book.” She got married and transformed, I guess.

I’m not usually bothered by other people’s spiritual or religious journeys, but I’m tired of conversations that revolve around my beliefs, especially with the same people. I’m even more tired of people who treat religion as their sole moral compass, as if those outside their worldview are inherently suspect.

The third time? A casual, harmless conversation with a former schoolmate, and I laughed. But even then, I couldn’t ignore the underlying disrespect of the question itself.

What is it about having a baby that prompts invasive questions all across the board? 

So, maybe I am the drama—or maybe I’m just someone who expects basic respect. Either way, I’ve decided that these moments, frustrating and hurtful as they were, don’t deserve space in my head anymore. People will think and say what they want, often without considering the impact. That’s on them, not me. 

No really, I look at you funny knowing that your mind went there.

That being said: Don’t be weird. 

(Edit: the narration is funnier if you read it like Annie from Young, Famous, and African)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Between Religion and Spirituality

I have been going through a lot. Not in the casual, everyday sense, but in the full-on mental breakdown sense—the ugly crying in the middle of the night to my partner, the friend nursing me back to health, the “cannot be left alone” kind of going through a lot. In the midst of that, I jokingly made a comment: that my current life experiences are almost enough to make me revert to organized religion. But even as I said it, I knew that comment itself contained the very reason I have problems with organized religion. So many people turn to their belief systems in times of hardship only. And yet, that reliance has always felt conditional, inconsistent—like a crutch pulled out only when the world feels unbearable. I grew up Roman Catholic, as did most of my family. Catholicism is a world of its own, but when we moved to South Africa and entered a “church hopping” phase, I quickly became confused and unimpressed. Who exactly were we praising here? Something always felt off about what I was w...

Bloom Again

I hope this is the last time I’ll be this candid. I tell myself that each time — that I’ll keep my thoughts locked in a private journal. But this isn’t that. This is for the moments when silence feels heavier than the truth, and when the truth is met with the world’s strange discomfort with the word  victim. I put the word in quotes because somewhere along the way, society decided it’s unseemly for us to claim it.  Survivor  is the softer, braver term. It’s supposed to shake off the pity in people’s eyes, to make us sound like we’ve climbed out of the wreckage and dusted ourselves off. I understand why some prefer it. But maybe it’s the literalist in me — I don’t understand why naming what happened to me is considered self-pity. I was wronged. I was harmed. I am the victim of a crime. That acknowledgment doesn’t mean I carry it as a badge or romanticize it. It’s just the truth. After putting my thoughts on trial I realized that it’s easier for me to think of things that h...

logic and emotion: a tale as old as the patriarchy

Dear Reader, I’d appreciate it if you read this blog post in the same cadence of Phaedra Parks checking Kenya Moore. It’s more fun. Or maybe Superman  talking to Lex Luthor?  Anyway. Here I come with another think piece that I keep hearing about, and I’m so tired, exhausted, and incredibly fatigued of hearing about it. You see, there’s a subspecies of human beings that wholeheartedly believe that logic and emotion might as well be oil and water.  Mind you, basing your argument on simply sounding like the Terminator doesn’t really change anything. You’re just robotic and wrong, possibly even a weirdo. I remember back in my first year of university, our group chat was on fire. Someone had the audacity to say, “This is why women don’t belong in the noble profession; they’re too emotional to argue with logic.” I had a laugh. As I’m having one now. The way men think sometimes—it’s so obtuse and primitive, like evolution took a lunch break and forgot to clock back in. And ...